RESUMEN
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in de-novo acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving induction chemotherapy. Despite using posaconazole, a broad-spectrum antifungal, for IFI prophylaxis, the breakthrough IFI rate is high in the real-world setting. One of the reasons could be frequent suboptimal plasma posaconazole levels. In the present study, we evaluated if therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guided posaconazole prophylaxis can reduce the IFI rates in comparison to a historical cohort. We enrolled 90 patients, > / = 16 years of age, without baseline IFIs, planned for remission induction therapy. All patients were started on posaconazole suspension 200 mg TDS and the dose was increased in a stepwise manner if trough levels were found to be suboptimal (< 350 ng/ml for day 2 or < 700 ng/ml subsequently). The TDM based approach resulted in a significant decline in breakthrough IFI rates (18% versus 52%, P < 0.0001) A total of 69 patients (78%) required dose escalation. Thirty-one patients required change in antifungals due to either suboptimal levels, persistent fever, diarrhoea or vomiting. We could not demonstrate an exposure-response relationship but the difference in IFI rates in patients with a median posaconazole level > / = 700 ng/ml (0%) and < 700 ng/ml (21.6%) was clinically meaningful. Posaconazole levels were found to be significantly lower in patients on antacids and prokinetics. The incidence of posaconazole-related grade 3 toxicity was low (2.3%). Thus TDM-based dosing of posaconazole helps reduce breakthrough IFI rate and should be a part of posaconazole prophylaxis. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-023-01709-3.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole has demonstrated a reduction in the risk of death due to Invasive fungal infections (IFI)in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) during induction therapy. However, various factors affect the plasma levels of posaconazole and can potentially limit its efficacy. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can help optimize the dose, but literature is scant from centers with a high IFI burden. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of de-novo AML patients on induction who could achieve the target level of 700ng/mL with posaconazole prophylaxis,factors that can influence the plasma levels, and the impact of plasma posaconazole levels on incidence of IFI. Methods: Patients with AML on induction therapy with no baseline IFI were enrolled at our tertiary cancer center which has high prevalence of IFI. These patients received posaconazole suspension as prophylaxis. Daily plasma levels were measured from Day 4 till Day 12 of posaconazole prophylaxis. All patients were monitored for the development of IFI. The data on adverse events, concomitant drugs, mucositis, vomiting, and diarrhea were recorded. Results: A total of 411 samples from fifty patients were collected. Only 177 out of 411 samples had levels > 700 ng/mL. The median trough level was 610 ng/mL (range30-3000 ng/mL). The median time to achieve target trough concentration was four days (range 4-12 days) from the start of induction.Thirty-eight (76%) patients achieved target plasma levels by day 12 of induction.The median plasma level on day 12 was 690 ng/mL (range,30-1270) in patients who achieved target levels as compared to 340 (50-560) ng/mL in those who did not. Twenty-six (52%) patients had IFI in our study, and the median time to develop breakthrough IFI was 14 days (range 4-24 days). Median and range of plasma levels were 690 ng/ml (30-2410; n = 22) in those who developed IFI, while 590 ng/mL (50-2300 n = 24) in those who did not. The odds of developing IFI in patients who did not achieve the threshold trough concentration of 700 ng/mL was 7.14 (95% CI; 1.35-37.75, p = 0.0206). Occurrence of vomiting (p = 0.02), diarrhea (p = 0.0008), mucositis (p = 0.003) had adverse impact on achievement of target plasma posaconazole levels. Conclusion: A significant proportion of patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis fail to achieve target plasma levels which can result in high risk of development of IFI. Occurrence of diarrhea, vomiting and mucositis can adversely affect the achievement target plasma levels.
